Beyond the Traditional Classroom: Active Methodologies to Promote Meaningful Learning in Natural Sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15377033Keywords:
Collaborative learning, Natural sciences, Basic education, Active methodologies.Abstract
The research focuses on the analysis of active methodologies in the teaching of Natural Sciences to basic education students, highlighting their importance in transforming learning. The main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of active methodologies and their impact on the academic performance and engagement of eighth-grade students. The applied methodology based on a mixed approach, using a quasi-experimental design with a control group. Data were collected through academic performance tests and questionnaires measuring motivation and engagement, along with interviews and classroom observations to document the implementation of active methodologies. The results show that there was a positive effect on students' academic performance, evidenced by an increase in average grades among those who participated in practical and collaborative activities compared to the control group that followed a traditional teaching model. The discussion emphasizes that while active methodologies foster a collaborative environment and increase student motivation, it is necessary to address deficiencies in teacher training and the need for more robust formative assessments to optimize the educational experience in Natural Sciences.
Downloads
References
Barrows, H. S. (2020). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer Publishing Company.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2019). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (2014). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (2021). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8
Choi, A. (2021). Developing critical thinking skills through problem-based learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 125–136.
Cohen, E. G. (2021). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2.ª ed.). Teachers College Press. https://n9.cl/7v6g56
Duarte, J. (2020). Metodologías activas para la innovación educativa. Revista de Innovación Educativa, 15(1), 135–148.
Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2022). Scaffolding teachers’ efforts to implement problem-based learning. International Journal of Learning, 13(1), 77–87. https://n9.cl/bnbgc
Fernández, A. (2021). Evaluación en metodologías activas: Nuevos enfoques. Revista de Evaluación Educativa, 28(2), 65–79.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
García, A., & Martínez, L. (2022). Project-based learning: Enhancing student engagement and academic performance. Journal of Educational Research, 115(2), 75–84.
Gillies, R. M. (2023). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00072-7
Gillies, R. M. (2022). Promoting effective group work in the classroom. Educational Practices Series, 22, 1–32.
Gutiérrez, C. M., Carreño, R. M., & Castellanos, C. L. (2018). Análisis comparación del aprendizaje basado en proyectos de forma tradicional y con mediación de las TIC. Revista Espacios, 39(52), 28. https://n9.cl/dl4ky
Hattie, J. (2019). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2023). An elaboration of social interdependence theory. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015534
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (2020). Cooperation in the classroom. Interaction Book Company
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2021). Project-based learning. En R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (3.ª ed., pp. 91–110). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108958844.006
López, B., & Moreno, C. (2022). Integración de tecnologías digitales en metodologías activas. Tecnología y Educación, 35(1), 85–98
Martínez, P. (2023). Desafíos en la implementación de metodologías activas. Revista de Pedagogía, 42(3), 145–158.
Miller, A., & Pellerin, M. (2021). Active learning: Engaging students in the classroom. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 18(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIEA.2009.5356379
Pérez, R., & Rodríguez, S. (2022). El aprendizaje basado en problemas en la educación científica. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 40(2), 195–208.
Prince, M. (2024). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Savery, J. R. (2020). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. En A. Walker, H. Leary, C. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential Readings in Problem-Based Learning: Exploring and Extending the Legacy of Howard S. Barrows (pp. 9–22). Purdue University Press. https://n9.cl/ct588
Slavin, R. E. (2022). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2.ª ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Suárez, M. (2021). Aprendizaje basado en proyectos: Una guía práctica. Revista de Educación, 45(1), 101–112.
Thomas, J. W. (2020). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation. https://n9.cl/dzdcqw
Topping, K. J. (2020). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 269–298. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003269
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Diana Carolina Plasencia Jaramillo, Jorge Jeffrey Vivero García, Milena Helen Rodríguez Caicedo, Juan Elías Guerrero Quintana (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los contenidos de la revista se distribuyen bajo una licencia Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Esto significa que los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o vincular los textos completos de los artículos, o usarlos para cualquier otro propósito legal, sin solicitar permiso previo del editor o del autor.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre y cuando indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en GEDI-PRAXIS. En caso de reproducción deberá constar una nota similar a la siguiente: Este texto se publicó originalmente en GEDI-PRAXIS. Revisita de Gestión, Educación y Ciencias Sociales, organizada y distribuida por la RED-GEDI, Año ----, Vol ----- N° ----, Páginas ---.
- Se recomienda a los autores/as publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) en la versión final publicada por RED-GEDI, ya que puede conducir a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).
